Street View: 8
Address: 26-27 High Holborn
Hooper’s shop only accidentally made it into a drawing by Thomas Hosmer Shepherd, and that only partially, as he depicted the two neighbouring properties, numbers 28 and 30. One half of Hooper’s premises can be seen on the right-hand side of Shepherd’s picture. The same cluster of houses was also depicted in volume 4 of Walford’s Old and New London. In both pictures the names of the shopkeepers are different from the ones in Tallis’s Street View; we will come back to that in the posts on the other buildings, but for now, we are just concerned with Hooper’s shop.
Hooper was first found at 27 High Holborn in an 1802 insurance policy with the Sun Alliance. He and Silvester Norton, confectioners, insure the property on the 1st of November of that year. They may have been at the address in earlier years, but I have not found any evidence for that. In November 1806 Silvester Norton married Elizabeth Hooper at St. Andrew’s, Holborn, and in September of 1807, John Hooper married Elizabeth Norton at St. Pancras Old Church. Both marriages were by licence and the entries in the church registers do not include the names of the parents, which is a pity, as that would have confirmed the double link between the Hooper and Norton siblings. As it is, they may be relatives, such as cousins or nieces rather than siblings, but that the two confectioners forged a double family bond is clear. Silvester’s will of 1826, however, helps as he describes John Hooper as his business partner and brother-in-law, so Elizabeth Norton, John Hooper’s wife, was most likely Silvester’s sister.(1) Anyway, after the death of Elizabeth, John married Sarah, the daughter of his neighbour Richard Swift, a perfumer at 28 High Holborn.
Tallis lists the Hoopers as ‘confectioners and lozenge manufacturers’. Lozenges were, according to The Guide to Trade: The Confectioner (1842) “composed of loaf-sugar in fine powder, and other substances, either liquid or in powder, which are mixed together and made into a paste with dissolved gum, rolled out into thin sheets, and formed with tin cutters into little cakes, either oval, square, or round, and dried”. I am slightly worried about the “other substances”, but the Guide starts the list with fairly innocuous additions to give the lozenges their taste, such as peppermint, cinnamon, lavender, or ginger. They then go on to sulpher, ipecacuanha, yellow pectoral (made with orris-root), and magnesium lozenges, among others. Yuk.
John Hooper's sons from his first marriage, John, William and Frederick, all entered into the business as wholesale confectioners. In the 1841 census, John senior is still found at 27 Holborn, but his occupation is listed as 'independent', so presumably retired. John junior and Frederick are found at the same address as 'confectioners'. At number 26 we find Charles Norton, Elizabeth Norton, and Thomas Norton. Charles (48 years old) is listed as 'independent' and after Elizabeth's name it says 'friends on a visit', but that is later crossed out. Thomas is 18 years old and 'shopman'. Thomas was most likely the son of Silvester, as he had a son John who was born in 1824, so definitely the right age, but what the exact link between the Hoopers and Charles and Elizabeth is, is uncertain. Thomas Norton is still at 26-27 High Holborn as a shopman in the next census of 1851. John Hooper senior is now listed as 'landed proprietor of houses' and although there is another John Hooper listed, it is not son John, but a 'nephew', working as 'warehouseman'. Another ten years on and the 1861 census lists John senior as 'gentleman' and son Frederick as the 'confectioner'.
Various directories show us the changes in the name of the business and address:
1811 London and County Directory: Hooper & Norton, wholesale confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1814 Post Office Directory: Hooper & Norton, wholesale confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1819 Post Office Directory: Hooper & Norton, wholesale confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1823 Kent’s Hooper & Norton, confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1825 Pigot’s Hooper & Norton, wholesale confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1839 Pigot’s John Hooper & Sons, wholesale confectioners, 27 High Holborn
1843 Post Office Directory: John Hooper & Sons, wholesale confectioners, 26-27 High Holborn
1848 Post Office Directory: John Hooper & Son, wholesale confectioners & lozenge manufacturers, 26-27 High Holborn
1851 Post Office Directory: J. Hooper & Son, wholesale confectioners, 26-27 High Holborn
1856 Post Office Directory: J. Hooper & Son, wholesale confectioners, 26-27 High Holborn
It is logical that Norton’s name disappeared after Silvester’s death in 1825, but the explanation for the expansion into number 26 is not so easy to link to a specific occasion. Did the neighbouring shop owner die, move away, go bankrupt and did Hooper take the opportunity to expand? Or was there another reason to take over number 26? Whatever the reason, the confectioners continued to make their lozenges from the combined address for many years to come.
John senior died in November 1865 and his executors were sons John and William, both listed as wholesale confectioners of 27 High Holborn.(2) At some point between 1866 and 1873, the sons must have sold the business as in the last instalment of The Building News of 1873, the rebuilding of 26-27 High Holborn was described as for Henry Brett & Co, whom we will encounter in a later post at 139 Holborn Bars as the proprietors of Furnival’s Inn, coffee house and hotel. The Building News gives details about the changes (see below), one of them the covering of the open courtyard with a timber roof with a lantern “the length of the store”. This lantern can clearly be seen on Goad’s insurance map of 1887. The WHSE you see in the picture just means ‘warehouse’. Brett informed his customers in an advertisement in the Daily News of 15 May 1874 that the distillery had been removed from Holborn Bars to their new building at 26-27 High Holborn. And with this, we have come to the end of our story for 26-27 Holborn.
(1) Silvester had died in July 1825 and was buried at St. Andrew’s on the 30th of that month. PROB 11/1710/11.
(2) England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations), 1866. His estate was valued at under £25,000.
|<– 28 High Holborn||25 High Holborn –>|
Pingback: Anthony Brown, musical instrument maker | London Street Views
Thanks Baldwin, really loved this one! Horrible yet brilliant Punch cartoon depicting the rather loose food standards in those days (there weren’t any!). Very interesting looking building that replaced it too, I wonder if a photograph exists?
Baldwin Hamey said:
Hi Will, thanks for your comment. I have not found a photograph of Brett’s new building, but I have not done an exhaustive search, so there may be one. If I come across one, I’ll let you know.
There is no suggestion that Hooper’s lozenges were dodgy, but I did like the cartoon.
Hi Baldwin! Just had a look at Streetview, unfortunately Brett’s building has been obliterated by some hideous modern blocky low rises, LEON, a fast food outlet, and a Boots Pharmacy. Basing that on the fact it is one building away from the present ‘Cittie of Yorke’ pub, formerly ‘Henekey & Co. Grays Inn Wine Establishment’, rebuilt in the 1920s, and that is next to the Grays Inn entrance rebuilt in the 1960s
I think it may be in Camden, so Camden Archives might have some photos (unfortunately catalogue currently offline)
Baldwin Hamey said:
Henneky’s was at number 23 in Tallis and has indeed been given that mock Cittie of York facade. Brett’s old establishment was further east, just beyond Brooke Street. I am not sure how long he remained at his new establishment next to Hooper, but I will try to sort him out some time. There were at least two Henry Bretts, father and son, involved at Holborn, so will have to sort these two out as well.
26-27 High Holborn was occupied by a Greek? tobacco merchant John Christoforidi /Christofrides / Christoforides from around 1915
he seems to have been there into the 1920s & declared bankrupt numerous times
It’s possible the building was then demolished as there is then reference from mid 1920s onwards to a Napier House at 24 & 27 or 24-27 High Holborn, unless it’s a re-numbering?
Baldwin Hamey said:
From the mid-1920s the Linguaphone Institute could be found at Napier House. Try this link https://reader.exacteditions.com/issues/33614/page/56?term=correctly. It is apparently available to subscribers, but it worked when I found it through Google.
Confusingly, The Linguaphone Institute seems to list itself variously at 24, 27 or 24-27 all around the same time. It also seems to list a different number before Napier House every time, perhaps a reference number? This one states:
“2 doors from Chancery Lane Tube Station”
Baldwin Hamey said:
Strange. If you Google “404 Napier House” you do not get very far. Could it have been an office number? As in Napier House, room 404? Or a department within the Liguaphone Institute? Just guessing; have no idea what it means.
And it isn’t really 2 doors from Chancery Station, is it? Well, Hooper’s shop certainly wasn’t.
Amazingly, there is a photo that was taken before the new tube station went up, by Francis Frith (it appears on a postcard currently on ebay), it was included in a book “Round London” published by George Newnes, 1896:
It shows Henekeys with its pillars and illuminated street lamps, what looks like S. Masters to the left of it, then Bretts, and then Mille Couleurs & Pacy’s still there!
Baldwin Hamey said:
Great find Will, thanks for your perseverance.
You’re welcome! I couldn’t believe it when I found it, everytime I look I notice something new. If you look at the old style (presumably horse drawn) omnibus on the left, you can see the classic Pears Soap ad in the middle!
Hi! I think there was a different number on every advert. I assume it was a way of tracking from whence the person saw it, hence they could work out which publications were most worth advertising in?
Regarding the station, yes actually I think it was! The original entrance was at 31-33 High Holborn, so presumably just to the left of Pacy’s? It was constructed in 1900, and is actually still there intact.
Which brings the question as to how the old 30-24 fit in between that and the current Cittie of York?!